Chinese Agent Charles Lieber & His Virus Transmitters"Dr. Charles Lieber is a nano-scientist at Harvard University. He was recently charged by the American authorities for secretly being a Chinese agent. However, there is a mystery surrounding the nature of his work. It is said he was recruited for advanced research into nanowire-batteries. But investigation by GreatGameIndia has shown that Lieber was infact working on virus transmitters that could penetrate cell membranes without affecting the intercellular functions and even measure activities inside heart cells and muscle fibers."
So when POTUS wanted the White House doctors to see the State Representative with Lyme disease HE BELIEVES their are cures for these "diseases" that modern medication makes millions of people live with because we spend 10,000s each per year on getting "medical" help that isn't curing but only prolonging a curable illness.
The healing components of herbs, minerals, vitamins and natural whole foods is well-known among holistic healers but shunned by MS professional doctors who are linked in to pharma and who make $100,000 plus per year (one of my doctors made $300,000 a year from pharma–I stopped going to him).
The current medical systems has NO DESIRE to cure our illnesses but to KEEP us on PHARMA life long.
The typical Western diet is an acid-forming diet, low in the valuable alkaline minerals.
Minerals! Yes. You don't make your body alkaline by drinking something alkaline. You take certain mineral supplements that change the alkalinity when they are absorbed.
Note that Zinc helps cure the cold, i.e. Rhinovirus infections. But you need to take a form of zinc that is easily absorbed or you will be literally pissing away your money. If you research HCQ you will notice that the doctors having most success also give a Zinc supplement.
The anecdotal evidence is building and at some point, we the people need to demand a proper clinical study that has not been rigged at the design stage. For instance, Vitamin C must NOT be used as a placebo. In fact, there should be separate studies on people who never use vitamin supplements, and those who regularly take multivitamins.
——————————————–
In most other members of the coronavirus family, such as human coronavirus HCoV-OC43 and bovine coronaviruses BCoV, the S protein may be post-translationally cleaved into two fragments, S1 (receptor-binding domain) and S2 (membrane fusion domain) [4], [5]. Studies on other coronaviruses have further elucidated that conformational changes of the S protein can be induced at 37 °C and pH 8.0, accompanied by the cleavage of S1 and S2, which triggers virus–cell membrane fusion [6], [7]. As a new member of the coronavirus family, SARS-CoV shares with other coronaviruses some similarity and common features in the amino acid sequences of the S protein [8]. It has been found that the S protein of SARS-CoV is post-translationally cleaved into S1 and S2 functional domains in the process of viral infection [9]. However, the impact of this cleavage on viral infectivity remains unclear [10].
Looks like the 'Nation-State' of CA is using the 'asymptomatic' angle to begin instituting 'surveillance testing' across CA breaking with the current CV Task Force/CDC Guidelines:
"The state instructions released Sunday name asymptomatic people living or working in places like nursing homes, prisons and some households as a number one priority to be tested.
California is the first state to move beyond the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) recommendations to prioritize hospitalized patients and symptomatic health care workers for testing.
In the second-tier of priority, the CDC lists those who are elderly or have underlying conditions and are experiencing symptoms.
The state guidelines also included a fourth-level priority, involving the testing of all low-risk symptomatic people and surveillance testing of asymptomatic people when possible."
Conclusion– this sets forth the framework for everyone and anyone to be nudged into surveillance blood/antibody testing, as any one can be considered/labeled a potential 'asymptomatic' carrier & thus be forced to test in order to re-enter work force/ general society. SICK!
Part 1 of 3 What is going on? "US data on influenza deaths are false and misleading. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges a difference between flu death and flu associated death yet uses the terms interchangeably. Additionally, there are significant statistical incompatibilities between official estimates and national vital statistics data. Compounding these problems is a marketing of fear—a CDC communications strategy in which medical experts "predict dire outcomes" during flu seasons. > The CDC website states what has become commonly accepted and widely reported in the lay and scientific press: annually "about 36 000 [Americans] die from flu" (www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease.htm) and "influenza/pneumonia" is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States (www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm). But why are flu and pneumonia bundled together? Is the relationship so strong or unique to warrant characterizing them as a single cause of death? David Rosenthal, director of Harvard University Health Services, said, "People don't necessarily die, per se, of the [flu] virus—the viraemia. What they die of is a secondary pneumonia. So many of these pneumonias are not viral pneumonias but secondary [pneumonias]." But Dr Rosenthal agreed that the flu/pneumonia relationship was not unique. For instance, a recent study (JAMA 2004;292: 1955-60[Abstract/Free Full Text]) found that stomach acid suppressing drugs are associated with a higher risk of community acquired pneumonia, but such drugs and pneumonia are not compiled as a single statistic. CDC states that the historic 1968-9 "Hong Kong flu" pandemic killed 34 000 Americans. At the same time, CDC claims 36 000 Americans annually die from flu. "
"At the 2004 "National Influenza Vaccine Summit," co-sponsored by CDC and the American Medical Association, Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at the NIP, spoke on using the media to boost demand for the vaccine. One step of a "Seven-Step `Recipe' for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination" occurs when "medical experts and public health authorities publicly…state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)—and urge influenza vaccination" (www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/36/2004_flu_nowak.pdf). Another step entails "continued reports…that influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people, helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza." Preceding the summit, demand had been low early into the 2003 flu season. "At that point, the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine for use in November or even December," recalled Dr Nowak on National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot." If flu is in fact not a major cause of death, this public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited. I am a pediatrician and this propaganda affects my practice directly. Kenneth Stoller International Hyperbaric Medical Association
Part 3 Continued No.8894349 "The CDC and other government agencies want Americans vaccinated against the flu for various institutional and economic reasons that have little to do with improving the health of most Americans. The CDC's orchestrated pro-flu vaccine annual propaganda campaign is a form of operant conditioning and would not be possible without reporters who do not tell the full story. Reporters could begin by questioning the motives of those who promote the use of ineffective and/or unsafe vaccines. See:
"The Seven-Step Recipe for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination]" – Planning for the 2004-05 Influenza Vaccination Season: A Communication Situation Analysis, Glen Nowak, Ph.D., Associate Director for Communications
▶Anonymous 04/22/20 (Wed) 16:32:20b716ac (3) No.8886902 Rebuke of the AP pseudo-study used by the MSM to discredit HCQ, by team of Pr. Raoult
In response to the bad Magagnoli 'scientific article' put forward by AP, and subsequently used by the MSM as a basis for the recent 4AM talking point campaign to discredit the efficacy of HCQ and make it sound dangerous, the team of Professor Raoult published the following short letter:
They go as far as calling the Magagnoli paper a case of scientific misconduct, forgoing rigorous and balanced scientific analysis to push erroneous negative claims.
The letter was probably written in a hurry, by people that are not fluent in English. But after reading the references, what they mean becomes clear.
I provide below a clearer restatement of their argument. Please share their letter, with or without this analysis (no attribution required if you choose to add it), if you want to help counter the current MSM disinformation wave about HCQ.
They point out the following three major flaws in the Magagnoli paper:
1) Lymphophenia occurs twice as much in all the HCQ groups than in the 'control' group, and it is known there is a direct correlation between lymphophenia and the risk of dying from COVID-19.
Magagnoli and al. acknowledged themselves in their paper that this disparity is present.
That did not prevent them from concluding the way they did anyway.
2) They present 2 distinct tables:
A) A first one, where there seem to be no difference in outcome between HCQ groups and the 'control' group, with poor statistical significance (for instance, p=0.79).
But see the point 3) to understand why that has occurred.
Furthermore, in this table, the time at which the treatments started before intubation is provided (while being excluded from table B).
B) A second one, where they omitted to provide information about when the treatment began.
To Raoult's team, the combination of:
-> this omission,
-> the fact that the time *before intubation* was provided in table A),
-> and the values of the medical indicators reported, congruent with that of patients treated after intubation
indicates that the data for that second table comes from patients that were intubated for some time before receiving an HCQ treatment, in desperation.
However it is known that at that stage, cytokine storm is occurring, and that HCQ alone cannot help patients anymore.
3) 30% of the 'control' group, astonishingly, actually received Azithromycin, even though Azithromycin alone can be a treatment (Gautret, 2020), and has been show to work in vitro (Andreani, 2020).
[It has been shown that Azithromycin has an HCQ-like effect for SARS-CoV-19, i.e. that it acts both as an antibiotic staving off secondary pulmonary infections and as a booster of the HCQ mechanism of action, which is the reason why the HCQ+AZ combination is so effective.]
-> For Raoult and al., this is close to being scientific fraud.
To Raoult and al., Magagnoli and al. use these 3 scientifically dishonest 'results' to push forward the idea that HCQ is dangerous, even though it has been reported to be one of the safest drugs available based on data from over 1 million patients (Lane, 2020).
In conclusion, Raoult and al. state that this is a good example of how, in these times, some are ready to publish results that do not stand up to any methodological analysis, in order to 'prove' a given set of predetermined desired claims.
▶Anonymous 04/22/20 (Wed) 16:54:307ffbcb (3) No.8887147 This is great. Downloaded and digesting
There are other docs on the site that are very interesting!
1Azithromycinand ciprofloxacin have a chloroquine-like effect onrespiratory epithelial cellsJens F. Poschet1, ElizabethA.Perkett2,3, Graham S. Timmins4#and Vojo Deretic1,5#Departmentsof 1Molecular Genetics and Microbiology 2Pediatricsand 3 Internal Medicine, 4Pharmaceutical Sciences, and5Autophagy, Inflammation and Metabolism Center of Biomedical Research Excellence, University of New Mexico Health Science Center# Co-corresponding author
AbstractThere isinterest in the use of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (CQ/HCQ) and azithromycin(AZT)in COVID-19 therapy. Employingcystic fibrosis respiratory epithelial cells, herewe show that drugs AZTandciprofloxacin(CPX)act as acidotropic lipophilic weak bases and conferin vitro effectson intracellular organellessimilarto the effects of CQ. These seemingly disparate FDA-approved antimicrobialsdisplay a common property of modulating pH of endosomes and trans-Golgi network.We believe this may in part help understandthe potentially beneficial effects of CQ/HCQ and AZT in COVID-19, and that the present considerations of HCQ and AZT for clinicaltrials should be extended to CPX.
and
Conclusion
4 Please cite this work as Gautret et al. (2020) Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID‐19: results of an open‐label non‐randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents – In Press 17 March 2020 – DOI : 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 Despite its small sample size our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.
This is dummy text. It is not meant to be read. Accordingly, it is difficult to figure out when to end it. But then, this is dummy text. It is not meant to be read. Period.
ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon